Share:

SR2455 over LONG CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.48829, -80.31443
35°29'18" N, 80°18'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:SR2455 over LONG CREEK
Structure number:000000000250095
Location:0.75 MI. N. JCT. SR2456
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:8.9 ft. [2.7 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:120 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:81.8 tons [74.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201799.0Fair6 out of 10-120
February 201599.0Fair6 out of 10-120
February 201372.0Poor4 out of 10SD120
February 201173.0Poor4 out of 10SD120
March 200989.0Fair5 out of 10-120
March 200789.0Fair5 out of 10-120
May 2005100.0Good7 out of 10-120
March 2003100.0Good7 out of 10-120
May 2002100.0Fair6 out of 10-120
November 1999100.0Good8 out of 10-130
October 1991100.0Good8 out of 10-70