Share:

SR1132 over HAMBY BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+35.35966, -80.50758
35°21'35" N, 80°30'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:SR1132 over HAMBY BRANCH
Structure number:000000000250351
Location:0.1 MI. E. JCT. SR2630
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,200 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201799.5Good7 out of 10-2200
February 201599.5Good7 out of 10-2200
February 201399.5Good7 out of 10-2100
February 201199.4Good7 out of 10-2400
March 200999.7Good9 out of 10-1300
October 200899.7Good8 out of 10-1300
March 200772.6Poor4 out of 10SD1300
April 200599.7Fair6 out of 10-1300
March 200399.5Good8 out of 10-2000
October 200199.5Good8 out of 10-2000
May 199999.6Good8 out of 10-1900