US70 WBL over NEWPORT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.78086, -76.8730034°46'51" N, 76°52'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US70 WBL over NEWPORT RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000310008 |
Location: | 0.2 MI.W.JCT.SR1140 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 226.1 ft. [68.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 10,500 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10500 | 65.5 |
May 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10500 | 64.5 |
May 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10500 | 64.5 |
May 2011 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 9000 | 63.7 |
May 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10000 | 75.8 |
April 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10500 | 75.7 |
June 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 11000 | 75.7 |
June 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 10500 | 75.7 |
September 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 10000 | 75.8 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 9600 | 75.8 |
April 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 11000 | 75.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,120 | 1,115 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,713 | 7,291 | 214 | 208 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 6,335 | 6,329 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 44 | 28 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 208 | 0 | 208 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 144 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 25 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 25 | 7 | 1 | 17 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 25 | 7 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 454 | 366 | 46 | 42 | 0 |