SR2222 over CREEK


+35.63345, -79.19548
35°38'00" N, 79°11'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR2222 over CREEK
Structure number:000000000370150
Location:0.5 MI. E. JCT. SR1953
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:8.9 ft. [2.7 m]
Total length:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2004
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201789.0Fair5 out of 10-100
February 201589.0Fair5 out of 10-100
February 2013100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
February 201199.0Good7 out of 10-100
March 200999.0Good7 out of 10-100
February 200799.0Good7 out of 10-100
January 2005100.0Good7 out of 10-100
February 200363.7PoorN out of 10SD80
April 200163.7PoorN out of 10SD80
April 199963.7PoorN out of 10SD60
April 199179.7FairN out of 10-60