+35.71530, -79.42641
35°42'55" N, 79°25'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR1373 over BR. OF ROCKY RIVER
Structure number:000000000370253
Location:0.4 MI. N. JCT. US64
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 1986]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
August 201694.3Good7 out of 10-100
September 201494.3Good7 out of 10-100
October 201294.3Good7 out of 10-100
October 201094.1Good7 out of 10-100
September 200894.1Good7 out of 10-100
October 200694.1Good7 out of 10-100
July 200494.1Fair6 out of 10-100
September 200294.1Good7 out of 10-100
October 200035.7PoorN out of 10SD100
August 199839.4PoorN out of 10SD100
August 199058.3FairN out of 10-100