SR2550 over BEAVERDAM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.51193, -80.1006235°30'43" N, 80°06'02" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR2550 over BEAVERDAM CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000570416 |
Location: | 0.1 MI. W. JCT. SR2552 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Total length: | 207.0 ft. [63.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.4 ft. [12.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2009 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 540 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 540 | 99.7 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 540 | 99.7 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 540 | 99.9 |
July 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 580 | 99.9 |
September 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 580 | 99.9 |
June 2008 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 2200 | 18.3 |
June 2006 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2200 | 18.3 |
June 2004 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2200 | 18.3 |
July 2002 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2200 | 18.3 |
July 2000 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2200 | 18.2 |
August 1998 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2200 | 18.2 |
September 1990 | Poor | Good | Fair | Poor | 300 | 25.4 |