Share:

NC32 over CORAPEAKE SWAMP

Gates County, North Carolina

Map

Coordinates:
+36.52523, -76.57731
36°31'31" N, 76°34'38" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NC32 over CORAPEAKE SWAMP
Structure number:000000000730018
Old structure number:000000000073018 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.2 MI N JCT SR1327
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, would be posted or closed except for temporary shoring [D]
Average daily traffic:3,300 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:37.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2018FairSatisfactoryGoodFair330037.4
January 2016FairGoodGoodFair330035.8
January 2014FairGoodGoodFair330035.8
January 2012FairFairFairFair380034.0
January 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory410082.2
January 2008FairFairFairSatisfactory370082.4
December 2005FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory350094.7
October 2003FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory360094.6
February 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory330094.7
February 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory360094.6
March 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory280094.9
March 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory280094.9
August 1994FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory300094.9
April 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory300094.9
March 1990FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory270095.0