SR1312 over MIDDLE SWAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+36.48969, -76.6781336°29'23" N, 76°40'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1312 over MIDDLE SWAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000730022 |
Old structure number: | 000000000073022 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.3 MI.N.JCT.SR1318 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1973 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 230 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 71.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 230 | 71.6 |
January 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 230 | 71.5 |
January 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 230 | 71.5 |
January 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 210 | 71.5 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 200 | 70.2 |
January 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 200 | 71.7 |
April 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 200 | 74.6 |
November 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 200 | 74.6 |
February 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 240 | 77.2 |
February 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 280 | 77.1 |
March 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 280 | 80.6 |
March 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 280 | 80.6 |
August 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 210 | 79.5 |
April 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 210 | 75.6 |
March 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 200 | 78.2 |