Share:

SR1779 over BEAVERDAM CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.27561, -78.70997
35°16'32" N, 78°42'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR1779 over BEAVERDAM CREEK
Structure number:000000000850156
Location:1.5 MI N OF JCT NC217
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,900 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:98.8

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
June 2016Good7 out of 10190098.8
June 2014Good7 out of 10190098.8
June 2012Good7 out of 10190097.8
June 2010Good8 out of 10490097.0
August 2008Good8 out of 10200098.8
May 2006Good8 out of 10520096.8
April 2004Good8 out of 10480097.1
April 2002Good8 out of 1013099.9
February 2000Good8 out of 1017099.9
January 1992FairN out of 1020074.7