Share:

CHARLOTTETOWNE AVE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.21377, -80.83583
35°12'50" N, 80°50'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHARLOTTETOWNE AVE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190164
Location:0.13 MI.W.JCT.SR3816
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Total length:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:91.5 ft. [27.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,000 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:87.8 tons [79.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201694.3GoodGoodGoodGood-18000
April 201494.3GoodGoodGoodGood-18000
April 201295.5GoodGoodGoodGood-15900
April 201070.7FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO15900
April 200870.7FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO15900
October 200670.7FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO15900
August 200470.7FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO15900
June 200270.7FairFairVery GoodSatisfactoryFO15900
June 200070.7FairFairVery GoodSatisfactoryFO15900
April 199870.7FairFairVery GoodSatisfactoryFO15900
July 199069.5FairFairVery GoodSatisfactoryFO18500