Share:

COULWOOD DRIVE over GUM BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+35.29805, -80.94434
35°17'53" N, 80°56'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:COULWOOD DRIVE over GUM BRANCH
Structure number:000000001190234
Old structure number:000000000119234 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.1 MI.E.JCT.FIELDING RD.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201662.7PoorGoodGoodPoorSD500
March 201462.7PoorGoodGoodPoorSD500
April 201278.7FairGoodGoodFair-500
April 201072.9FairGoodGoodFair-500
April 200872.9FairGoodGoodFair-500
May 200650.4PoorGoodGoodPoorSD500
April 200475.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-500
July 200272.7GoodGoodGoodGood-500
July 200072.7GoodGoodGoodGood-500
March 199878.8GoodGoodGoodGood-500
May 199655.1GoodGoodGoodGoodSD500
September 199489.7GoodGoodGoodGood-500
May 199287.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-500
April 199088.5GoodGoodGoodGood-500