Share:

BRANDYWINE AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.17284, -80.84631
35°10'22" N, 80°50'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BRANDYWINE AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190394
Old structure number:000000000119394 (from 1992 edition)
Location:200 FT.E.JCT.WOODLAWN RD.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Total length:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Skew angle:34°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,600 [as of 1993]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:69.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201669.9FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO6600
April 201471.1FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6600
April 201247.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
April 201069.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
April 200869.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
March 200669.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
April 200469.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
July 200269.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
August 200069.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6600
March 199875.0GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO6600
June 199675.0GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO6600
August 199455.6GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO6600
July 199254.4FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO8000
May 199054.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO8000