Share:

HILLSIDE AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.17896, -80.84621
35°10'44" N, 80°50'46" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:HILLSIDE AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190395
Old structure number:000000000119395 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.3 MI E JCT PARK ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Total length:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,600 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:65.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2016FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory260065.0
June 2014FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory260088.4
June 2012FairFairFairFair260076.3
June 2010FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory190086.6
October 2008FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory190086.6
May 2006FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory190074.2
March 2004FairFairGoodSatisfactory190078.5
July 2002FairFairVery GoodSatisfactory190078.5
August 2000FairFairVery GoodSatisfactory190078.5
March 1998FairFairVery GoodGood190074.2
June 1996FairFairVery GoodGood190074.2
August 1994FairFairVery GoodGood190064.9
July 1992FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory300071.1
May 1990FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory300067.5