Share:

PRINCETON AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.18653, -80.84491
35°11'11" N, 80°50'42" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PRINCETON AVENUE over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190396
Old structure number:000000000119396 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.5 MI. E. JCT. PARK ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Total length:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,700 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:48.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
April 2016FairSatisfactoryFairFair270048.7
April 2014FairFairGoodFair270047.7
April 2012FairFairGoodFair450047.1
April 2010FairGoodGoodSatisfactory450053.9
April 2008FairGoodGoodSatisfactory450053.9
June 2006FairGoodGoodSatisfactory450053.9
March 2004FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory450068.2
July 2002FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory450068.2
August 2000FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory450068.2
March 1998FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactory450058.2
June 1996FairFairGoodSatisfactory450057.2
August 1994FairFairVery GoodSatisfactory450067.1
July 1992FairFairGoodSatisfactory500067.0
May 1990FairFairSatisfactoryFair500052.8