Share:

EAST BOULEVARD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.19627, -80.83839
35°11'47" N, 80°50'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:EAST BOULEVARD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190397
Old structure number:000000000119397 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.4 MI.E.JCT.SCOTT AVE.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:17,000 [as of 1991]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:59.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2016FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700059.1
June 2014PoorFairPoorFair1700028.1
June 2012FairFairFairFair1700054.4
June 2010FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700048.0
August 2008FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700048.0
May 2006FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700054.1
March 2004PoorSatisfactoryGoodPoor1700042.9
July 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodFair1700058.9
August 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodFair1700058.9
March 1998FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700054.1
June 1996FairFairSatisfactoryFair1700055.5
September 1994FairFairGoodSatisfactory1700054.2
July 1992FairFairFairSatisfactory1700055.2
June 1990FairFairFairFair1700055.2