Share:

MEDICAL CENTER DR. over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.20298, -80.83716
35°12'11" N, 80°50'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:MEDICAL CENTER DR. over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190398
Location:.01 MI.E.JCT.BLYTHE BLVD.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Total length:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10,000 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201661.8FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO10000
June 201451.4FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO10000
June 201262.4FairFairGoodFairFO10000
June 201061.4FairSatisfactoryGoodFairFO10000
July 200861.4FairSatisfactoryGoodFairFO10000
May 200658.3PoorPoorGoodFairSD10000
March 200458.3PoorPoorSatisfactoryFairSD10000
July 200258.3PoorPoorSatisfactoryFairSD10000
October 200058.3PoorPoorSatisfactoryFairSD10000
March 199860.3FairFairGoodFairFO10000
June 199046.9PoorFairPoorPoorSD10000