Share:

18TH STREET over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.23380, -80.82195
35°14'02" N, 80°49'19" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:18TH STREET over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190410
Location:200 FT.S.JCT.DAVIDSON ST.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2016
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1991]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:33.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2016PoorPoorPoorFair50033.8
May 2014PoorPoorPoorFair50033.8
May 2012PoorFairPoorFair50033.8
May 2010FairGoodSatisfactoryGood50058.2
August 2008FairGoodSatisfactoryGood50058.2
June 2006GoodGoodGoodGood50067.6
April 2004GoodGoodGoodGood50067.6
July 2002GoodGoodGoodGood50067.6
July 2000GoodGoodGoodGood50067.6
April 1998GoodGoodGoodGood50063.8
May 1990FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair50045.8