Share:

FOUR MILE CRK ROAD over UT TO FOURMILE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.07744, -80.79191
35°04'39" N, 80°47'31" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FOUR MILE CRK ROAD over UT TO FOURMILE CREEK
Structure number:000000001190527
Location:.04 N.JCT.FAIRWAY RIDGE R
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:800 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
May 2016Fair5 out of 1080088.9
May 2014Fair6 out of 1080099.9
May 2012Good7 out of 1080099.9
May 2010Good7 out of 1080099.9
July 2008Good7 out of 1080099.9
October 2007Good8 out of 1080099.9
March 2004Good8 out of 1080099.9
April 2002Good8 out of 1080099.9
May 2000Good8 out of 1080087.5
March 1998Good8 out of 1080087.5
June 1990Good8 out of 1080089.1