COUNTY HIGHWAY over BIG COULEE
Map
Coordinates:
+48.28188, -99.1717148°16'55" N, 99°10'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over BIG COULEE |
Structure number: | 000000036102181 |
Location: | 1 E 1 N CHURCH'S FERRY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Total length: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2018] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 41.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $299,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
November 2016 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
October 2014 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
July 2012 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
September 2010 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
January 2009 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
October 2007 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
September 2005 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
January 2005 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
December 2002 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
September 2001 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 41.0 |
January 1999 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 100.0 |
December 1997 | Good | - | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 100.0 |
April 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 20 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 161 | 161 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 355 | 355 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 39 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |