COUNTY HIGHWAY over DES LACS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+48.47032, -101.7617448°28'13" N, 101°45'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over DES LACS RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000038112370 |
Location: | 2 NORTH 2 WEST OF CARPIO |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Total length: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2018] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 25 | 91.2 |
October 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 25 | 91.2 |
October 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 25 | 91.2 |
May 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
November 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
January 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
January 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
January 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
January 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 91.2 |
January 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 25 | 100.0 |
July 1999 | Poor | - | Very Good | Imminent Failure | 25 | 40.0 |
February 1997 | Fair | - | Very Good | Fair | 25 | 82.8 |
February 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 24 | 93.8 |
January 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 24 | 93.8 |
February 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 24 | 93.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 289 | 289 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,336 | 2,336 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 62 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 151 | 151 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |