Share:

SCENIC LOOP DRIVE over PADDOCK CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+46.95696, -103.50084
46°57'25" N, 103°30'03" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SCENIC LOOP DRIVE over PADDOCK CREEK
Structure number:1540001P0000000
Location:SCENIC LOOP DRIVE, MILEPO
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Owner:National Park Service [66]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Sufficiency rating:91.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$14,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017FairGoodGoodSatisfactory20091.1
September 2015GoodGoodGoodGood20099.6
September 2013GoodGoodGoodGood20099.6
September 2011GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6
September 2009GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6
September 2007GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6
September 2005GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6
September 2003GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6
October 2001GoodGoodVery GoodGood20099.6