COUNTY HIGHWAY over GOOSE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.08000, -100.0933342°04'48" N, 100°05'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over GOOSE CREEK |
Structure number: | C000500210P |
Location: | 17.5N .4E DUNNING |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1978 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 29.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 5 | 29.3 |
September 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 5 | 29.3 |
September 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 5 | 29.3 |
September 2012 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 5 | 26.8 |
October 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 5 | 26.8 |
October 2008 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 5 | 26.8 |
November 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 5 | 42.8 |
October 2004 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 5 | 42.8 |
November 2002 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 5 | 50.9 |
November 2000 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 5 | 52.9 |
September 1998 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 5 | 52.9 |
October 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 5 | 58.9 |
January 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5 | 68.9 |
November 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5 | 68.9 |
December 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 5 | 68.9 |