Share: 
FAS 1755 over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.07169, -100.24854
42°04'18" N, 100°14'55" W
+42.07169, -100.24854
42°04'18" N, 100°14'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FAS 1755 over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
| Structure number: | C000500305 |
| Location: | 11.5N 1E HALSEY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Total length: | 154.9 ft. [47.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2007 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 75 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 91.9 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
| September 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
| September 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
| August 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 65 | 97.9 |
| December 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 125 | 97.8 |
| December 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 85 | 97.8 |
| November 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 85 | 48.6 |
| October 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 105 | 48.0 |
| November 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 105 | 48.0 |
| November 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 80 | 65.7 |
| September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 80 | 64.7 |
| September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 80 | 70.6 |
| January 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 80 | 70.6 |
| November 1992 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 80 | 82.9 |
| December 1990 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 80 | 83.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344751
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344751