FAS 1755 over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.07169, -100.2485442°04'18" N, 100°14'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FAS 1755 over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
Structure number: | C000500305 |
Location: | 11.5N 1E HALSEY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Total length: | 154.9 ft. [47.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 40° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2007 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 75 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.9 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
September 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
September 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 75 | 91.9 |
August 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 65 | 97.9 |
December 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 125 | 97.8 |
December 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 85 | 97.8 |
November 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 85 | 48.6 |
October 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 105 | 48.0 |
November 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 105 | 48.0 |
November 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 80 | 65.7 |
September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | 80 | 64.7 |
September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 80 | 70.6 |
January 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 80 | 70.6 |
November 1992 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 80 | 82.9 |
December 1990 | Fair | - | Good | Fair | 80 | 83.9 |