Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.06333, -100.21833
42°03'48" N, 100°13'06" W
+42.06333, -100.21833
42°03'48" N, 100°13'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
| Structure number: | C000500505P |
| Location: | 11N 2E HALSEY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2011 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 94.9 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 7 | 94.9 |
| September 2016 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 7 | 92.9 |
| September 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 7 | 92.9 |
| August 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 5 | 93.0 |
| September 2011 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 5 | 93.0 |
| October 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 5 | 38.8 |
| October 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 5 | 38.8 |
| November 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 5 | 36.8 |
| October 2004 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 5 | 36.8 |
| November 2002 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.2 |
| November 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 49.2 |
| September 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 49.2 |
| September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5 | 56.3 |
| January 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5 | 56.3 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5 | 56.3 |
| December 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5 | 56.3 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344752
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344752