Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over MIDDLE LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.87500, -100.21000
41°52'30" N, 100°12'36" W
+41.87500, -100.21000
41°52'30" N, 100°12'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over MIDDLE LOUP RIVER |
| Structure number: | C000500705 |
| Location: | 3N 5W DUNNING |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4 [as of 2016] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 4 | 28.4 |
| September 2016 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 4 | 28.4 |
| September 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 10 | 26.8 |
| October 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 10 | 29.0 |
| October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 29.0 |
| July 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 29.0 |
| October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 29.0 |
| November 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 10 | 32.4 |
| October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 47.6 |
| November 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10 | 47.6 |
| November 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10 | 47.6 |
| October 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 49.6 |
| September 1996 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 54.8 |
| January 1995 | Poor | Good | Very Good | Poor | 10 | 32.8 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 54.8 |
| November 1990 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 54.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344754
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1344754