FAS 1690 over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.00894, -100.0728642°00'32" N, 100°04'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FAS 1690 over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
Structure number: | C000502105 |
Location: | JCT N2/N91 12.2N 1.5E |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 102.0 ft. [31.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 70 | 92.9 |
August 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 55 | 93.3 |
August 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 55 | 93.3 |
August 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 45 | 99.4 |
December 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 75 | 99.2 |
December 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 45 | 99.4 |
November 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 45 | 99.4 |
October 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 100 | 99.1 |
November 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 100 | 99.1 |
November 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 60 | 99.3 |
October 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 60 | 99.3 |
October 1996 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 60 | 99.2 |
January 1996 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 60 | 99.2 |
January 1995 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 60 | 47.7 |
November 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 60 | 47.7 |
December 1990 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 60 | 45.6 |