FAS 1755 over PLUM CREEK


+42.66675, -100.05531
42°40'00" N, 100°03'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAS 1755 over PLUM CREEK
Structure number:C000901505P
Location:WJCT US20/N7 10W 8.2N
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1977
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:190 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:67.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201667.3FairFairExcellentVery Good-190
April 201467.3FairFairExcellentExcellent-190
May 201279.3FairFairExcellentExcellent-190
May 201079.6FairFairExcellentExcellent-130
November 200879.5FairFairExcellentExcellent-160
November 200632.6FairFairExcellentExcellentFO160
November 200433.2FairFairExcellentExcellentFO120
September 200233.2FairFairExcellentExcellentFO120
January 200133.5FairFairExcellentExcellentFO100
March 199933.5FairFairExcellentExcellentFO100
September 199734.7GoodExcellentExcellentExcellentFO90
December 199535.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellentFO70
November 199334.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellentFO80
July 199134.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellentFO80