COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.47167, -101.7466740°28'18" N, 101°44'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK |
Structure number: | C001503105P |
Location: | E OF MILL POND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 54.1 ft. [16.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2003] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 43.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 43.8 |
August 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 51.9 |
August 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 51.9 |
August 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 50.8 |
September 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 50.8 |
November 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 100 | 39.0 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
July 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
April 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
July 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
August 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |