Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.47167, -101.74667
40°28'18" N, 101°44'48" W
+40.47167, -101.74667
40°28'18" N, 101°44'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK |
| Structure number: | C001503105P |
| Location: | E OF MILL POND |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Total length: | 54.1 ft. [16.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1935 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2003] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 43.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 43.8 |
| August 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 51.9 |
| August 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 51.9 |
| August 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 50.8 |
| September 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 50.8 |
| November 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 100 | 39.0 |
| October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| July 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| July 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| April 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| July 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
| August 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 61.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346171
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346171