Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.47000, -101.72333
40°28'12" N, 101°43'24" W
+40.47000, -101.72333
40°28'12" N, 101°43'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK |
| Structure number: | C001503505 |
| Location: | 4W 3S OF IMPERIAL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 7.9 ft. [2.4 m] |
| Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2000 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2003] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 96.9 |
| August 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 96.9 |
| August 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 96.9 |
| August 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| October 2009 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| December 2008 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| October 2006 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| October 2004 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| October 2002 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| December 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 97.0 |
| August 1998 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 94.9 |
| July 1996 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 94.9 |
| April 1994 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 94.9 |
| June 1992 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 94.9 |
| August 1990 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 94.9 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346172
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346172