Share: 
COLL 7237 over STINKING WATER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.53393, -101.36307
40°32'02" N, 101°21'47" W
+40.53393, -101.36307
40°32'02" N, 101°21'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COLL 7237 over STINKING WATER CREEK |
| Structure number: | C001507310 |
| Location: | 7.5N OF WAUNETA |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1972 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 160 [as of 1998] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 81.5 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 160 | 81.5 |
| August 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 160 | 81.0 |
| August 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 160 | 81.0 |
| August 2012 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 85.3 |
| December 2010 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 85.3 |
| December 2008 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 86.3 |
| October 2006 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| October 2004 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| October 2002 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| September 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| June 1998 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| July 1996 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| April 1994 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 97.9 |
| April 1992 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 84.4 |
| August 1990 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 160 | 84.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346179
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346179