COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.43000, -101.4183340°25'48" N, 101°25'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over FRENCHMAN CREEK |
Structure number: | C001516705 |
Location: | 2W .5N OF WAUNETA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Total length: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Year reconstructed: | 2016 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 10 | 86.5 |
August 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 10 | 86.5 |
August 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 49.0 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 48.8 |
December 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 48.8 |
May 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 48.8 |
October 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 76.0 |
October 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 76.0 |
October 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 76.0 |
September 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 76.0 |
July 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.0 |
July 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.0 |
April 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.0 |
April 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.0 |
July 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.0 |