Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over SPRING CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.89667, -100.51333
42°53'48" N, 100°30'48" W
+42.89667, -100.51333
42°53'48" N, 100°30'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over SPRING CREEK |
| Structure number: | C001601604P |
| Location: | 1E 1N VALENTINE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1980 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2003] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.8 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.8 |
| June 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.8 |
| June 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.8 |
| June 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.5 |
| June 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.5 |
| June 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 88.5 |
| June 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| July 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| November 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| October 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| December 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| June 1996 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| December 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| November 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| November 1990 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346195
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1346195