COUNTY HIGHWAY over NIOBRARA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.87667, -100.2666742°52'36" N, 100°16'00" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over NIOBRARA RIVER |
Structure number: | C001611805 |
Location: | 13.5E OF VALENTINE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 149.0 ft. [45.4 m] |
Total length: | 149.9 ft. [45.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1899 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2 [as of 1997] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 20.7 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 2 | 20.7 |
June 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 2 | 21.7 |
June 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 2 | 21.7 |
January 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 2 | 22.0 |
February 2010 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 2 | 22.0 |
June 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 2 | 21.0 |
March 2008 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Fair | 2 | 19.0 |
June 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
May 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
December 2003 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
October 2001 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
June 1999 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
September 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
December 1995 | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
November 1993 | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |
November 1991 | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Fair | 2 | 22.0 |