COUNTY HIGHWAY over NIOBRARA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.84833, -101.3200042°50'54" N, 101°19'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over NIOBRARA RIVER |
Structure number: | C001657705P |
Location: | 5.5S 3W OF CODY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 90.9 ft. [27.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1916 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 35 | 72.0 |
June 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 35 | 16.0 |
June 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 35 | 11.3 |
January 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 35 | 17.4 |
February 2010 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 35 | 19.6 |
March 2008 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 35 | 17.4 |
July 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 23.6 |
April 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 23.6 |
June 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 23.6 |
November 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 23.6 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 35 | 24.6 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 35 | 24.6 |
June 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 19.6 |
November 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 19.6 |
November 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 35 | 23.2 |
March 1992 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 35 | 21.1 |