265TH STREET over OMAHA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.28500, -96.4900042°17'06" N, 96°29'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 265TH STREET over OMAHA CREEK |
Structure number: | C002213410P |
Location: | 2.4S OF HOMER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Total length: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 33.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 40 | 33.3 |
October 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 40 | 33.3 |
October 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 40 | 33.3 |
October 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 40 | 33.9 |
December 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 40 | 33.9 |
December 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 40 | 33.9 |
November 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 40 | 33.9 |
August 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
September 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
October 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
September 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
September 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
September 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 47.8 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 40 | 46.1 |
November 1989 | Poor | Critical | Poor | Critical | 40 | 27.9 |