COUNTY HIGHWAY over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+42.46667, -96.6983342°28'00" N, 96°41'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over STREAM |
Structure number: | C002230315P |
Location: | 1N 6.5W OF JACKSON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Total length: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Year reconstructed: | 1998 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 15 | 79.8 |
August 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 79.8 |
August 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 79.8 |
August 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 79.5 |
September 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 79.5 |
August 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 79.5 |
August 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 64.3 |
August 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 59.3 |
September 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 59.3 |
October 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 59.3 |
November 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 15 | 42.8 |
September 1996 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 15 | 19.5 |
October 1994 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 15 | 19.5 |
October 1992 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 15 | 19.5 |
November 1989 | Poor | Critical | Serious | Serious | 15 | 19.5 |