EAST APPLE ROAD over M BR BIG NEMAHA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+40.50833, -96.5833340°30'30" N, 96°34'60" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | EAST APPLE ROAD over M BR BIG NEMAHA RIVER |
Structure number: | C003400415 |
Location: | 3.2N 3.5W OF ADAMS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 80 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 30.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 30.5 |
September 2015 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 30.6 |
October 2013 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 25.2 |
February 2012 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 26.4 |
February 2011 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 26.4 |
January 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 80 | 24.3 |
August 2007 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 80 | 27.6 |
October 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 42.7 |
October 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 43.7 |
November 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 43.7 |
October 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 42.7 |
October 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 42.7 |
October 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 42.7 |
November 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 80 | 23.9 |
October 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 35.0 |
November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 35.0 |
October 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 41.2 |