Share:

TOWNSHIP ROAD over PISCHEL CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+42.71977, -98.21765
42°43'11" N, 98°13'04" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:TOWNSHIP ROAD over PISCHEL CREEK
Structure number:C005402205P
Location:6.5S 1.5W OF VERDEL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1905
Year reconstructed:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:15 [as of 2003]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2]
Operating rating:16.0 tons [14.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:10.0 tons [9.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:43.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201543.1FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactorySD15
October 201329.4PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD15
February 201229.9PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD15
August 201038.1FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactorySD15
October 200733.8FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
November 200533.8FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
September 200333.8FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
August 200133.8FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
May 199933.8FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
September 199729.9FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
September 199522.4FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
September 199322.4FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15
August 199122.4FairVery GoodFairVery GoodSD15