Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over CALAMUS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.08667, -99.64333
42°05'12" N, 99°38'36" W
+42.08667, -99.64333
42°05'12" N, 99°38'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over CALAMUS RIVER |
| Structure number: | C005800205 |
| Location: | 5W US183 ROCK CL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Total length: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2003] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 39.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 35 | 39.9 |
| October 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 39.9 |
| October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 39.9 |
| December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 40.0 |
| December 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 40.0 |
| October 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 40.0 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 69.2 |
| December 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 69.2 |
| December 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 69.2 |
| January 2001 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 35 | 46.1 |
| December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 35 | 59.1 |
| December 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 83.0 |
| October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 83.0 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 83.0 |
| October 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 74.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1350868
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1350868