Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over CALAMUS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.98500, -99.42667
41°59'06" N, 99°25'36" W
+41.98500, -99.42667
41°59'06" N, 99°25'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over CALAMUS RIVER |
| Structure number: | C005801605 |
| Location: | 2W 14.7N OF TAYLOR |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Total length: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 2003] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2018 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 15 | 35.4 |
| October 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 15 | 48.5 |
| October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 15 | 48.5 |
| December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 58.3 |
| December 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 58.3 |
| October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 58.3 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 15 | 55.5 |
| December 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 15 | 55.5 |
| December 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 55.5 |
| January 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 55.5 |
| December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 55.5 |
| December 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 15 | 55.5 |
| October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 15 | 55.5 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 15 | 54.5 |
| October 1990 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 15 | 54.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1350871
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1350871