COUNTY HIGHWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.91500, -99.6550041°54'54" N, 99°39'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
Structure number: | C005802605 |
Location: | 13.7W 10N OF TAYLOR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 79.1 ft. [24.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2012 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.2 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 50.2 |
October 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 50.2 |
October 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 50.2 |
December 2012 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 20 | 34.9 |
December 2010 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 20 | 34.9 |
October 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 20 | 34.9 |
January 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 20 | 33.9 |
December 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 20 | 33.9 |
December 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 20 | 33.9 |
January 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 20 | 33.9 |
December 1998 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 20 | 33.9 |
November 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 20 | 44.2 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 20 | 44.2 |
November 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 20 | 44.2 |
October 1990 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 20 | 40.3 |