COUNTY HIGHWAY over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+40.11838, -98.2765140°07'06" N, 98°16'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over STREAM |
Structure number: | C009143435 |
Location: | 2.7N 2.5E GUIDE ROCK |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
Total length: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Operating rating: | 17.9 tons [16.3 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 11.0 tons [10.0 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
May 2016 | 50.4 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
May 2014 | 50.4 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
September 2012 | 50.3 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
July 2010 | 43.3 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Fair | FO | 30 |
December 2008 | 50.3 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
November 2006 | 40.0 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
December 2004 | 40.0 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
December 2002 | 40.0 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
December 2000 | 39.0 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
December 1998 | 39.0 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 30 |
November 1996 | 39.0 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | SD | 30 |
December 1994 | 40.0 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | SD | 30 |
December 1992 | 40.0 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | SD | 30 |
December 1990 | 40.0 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | SD | 30 |