COUNTY ROADWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.33333, -100.7616742°19'60" N, 100°45'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROADWAY over NORTH LOUP RIVER |
Structure number: | C0E1603510P |
Location: | 6.5W 2.7N OF BROWNLEE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Total length: | 128.9 ft. [39.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Number of main spans: | 8 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 32.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 5 | 32.8 |
April 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 5 | 32.8 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 5 | 32.8 |
August 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 5 | 32.8 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 5 | 32.8 |
May 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 46.6 |
April 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 46.6 |
December 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 46.6 |
November 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 46.6 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.6 |
September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.6 |
November 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.3 |
November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.3 |
October 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5 | 47.3 |