Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over MINNECHADUZA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.89500, -100.51500
42°53'42" N, 100°30'54" W
+42.89500, -100.51500
42°53'42" N, 100°30'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over MINNECHADUZA CREEK |
| Structure number: | C0E1606305 |
| Location: | 1E 2N OF VALENTINE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2012 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2003] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 40 | 71.3 |
| June 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 40 | 71.1 |
| June 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 40 | 71.1 |
| June 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 47.5 |
| June 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 47.5 |
| June 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 47.5 |
| June 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 65.0 |
| July 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 65.0 |
| November 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 62.0 |
| October 2000 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 40 | 62.0 |
| September 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 40 | 80.0 |
| June 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.8 |
| December 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.8 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 78.5 |
| November 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 78.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1355688
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1355688