COLL 7327 over MINNECHADUZA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.88981, -100.5346142°53'23" N, 100°32'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COLL 7327 over MINNECHADUZA CREEK |
Structure number: | C0E1616105 |
Location: | .7N VALENTINE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Total length: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2014 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 150 [as of 1998] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 150 | 85.0 |
April 2016 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 150 | 86.1 |
April 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 150 | 86.1 |
May 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 150 | 32.4 |
May 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 150 | 32.4 |
May 2008 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 150 | 32.4 |
August 2006 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 150 | 50.9 |
July 2004 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 150 | 50.9 |
November 2002 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 150 | 50.9 |
May 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 150 | 50.9 |
October 1998 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 150 | 50.9 |
June 1996 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 150 | 33.6 |
December 1994 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 150 | 33.6 |
December 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 150 | 66.5 |
November 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 150 | 66.5 |