Share:

BROADWAY STREET over LITTLE BAZILE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+42.60526, -97.64788
42°36'19" N, 97°38'52" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:BROADWAY STREET over LITTLE BAZILE CREEK
Structure number:M0290G6705
Location:BLOOMFIELD BROADWAY ST
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.4 ft. [10.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.8

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201692.8GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
December 201492.8GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
March 201393.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
February 201193.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
October 200893.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
November 200693.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
October 200493.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
November 200293.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
July 200093.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
September 199893.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
December 199693.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
January 199495.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
April 1992100.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200
September 199018.7PoorFairPoorSatisfactorySD200