+42.69101, -97.00266
42°41'28" N, 97°00'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:N12 over LIME CREEK
Structure number:S012 21579
Location:1.5W MASKELL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,225 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201696.2GoodGoodGoodGood-1225
September 201496.2GoodGoodGoodGood-1225
September 201299.6GoodGoodGoodVery Good-1285
September 201099.7GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-975
September 200899.7GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-975
September 200699.7GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-965
March 200499.7GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-955
September 200299.8GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-610
February 200099.8GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-575
March 199899.8GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-575
March 199697.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-620
March 199494.8FairFairGoodGood-570
March 199295.9FairFairGoodGood-400
March 199096.9FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-400