N96 over CALAMUS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.92850, -99.3397041°55'43" N, 99°20'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | N96 over CALAMUS RIVER |
Structure number: | S096 00272 |
Location: | 11N 2.3E TAYLOR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Total length: | 86.0 ft. [26.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 205 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 205 | 99.5 |
March 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 210 | 96.5 |
March 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 210 | 97.0 |
March 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 97.0 |
April 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 97.0 |
March 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 185 | 97.0 |
March 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 205 | 97.0 |
July 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 260 | 96.9 |
March 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 240 | 98.9 |
July 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 260 | 97.9 |
July 1997 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 270 | 92.9 |
October 1996 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 190 | 93.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 342 | 342 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,795 | 2,773 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 127 | 124 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 65 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 172 | 160 | 12 | 0 | 0 |