US183 over CALAMUS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.94697, -99.3860041°56'49" N, 99°23'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US183 over CALAMUS RIVER |
Structure number: | S183 13617 |
Location: | 12N TAYLOR |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 37.7 ft. [11.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1966 |
Year reconstructed: | 1998 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Epoxy Overlay [5] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 500 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 500 | 79.5 |
March 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 435 | 81.2 |
March 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 435 | 96.7 |
March 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 405 | 96.6 |
April 2009 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Good | 405 | 96.6 |
March 2007 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Good | 475 | 98.7 |
March 2005 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Good | 460 | 98.7 |
July 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 470 | 98.7 |
March 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 455 | 98.7 |
July 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 480 | 98.7 |
September 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 350 | 99.0 |
July 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 350 | 77.2 |
July 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 380 | 75.1 |
July 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 300 | 75.4 |
July 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 325 | 75.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 221 | 215 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 77 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 126 | 126 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,413 | 2,373 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,268 | 2,148 | 120 | 0 | 0 |