WB-US6/DODGE ST over I480/US75
Map
Coordinates:
+41.25976, -95.9537541°15'35" N, 95°57'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WB-US6/DODGE ST over I480/US75 |
Structure number: | S480 00231 |
Location: | IN OMAHA |
Purpose: | Carries highway overpass over highway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 235.9 ft. [71.9 m] |
Total length: | 476.1 ft. [145.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 9° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Year reconstructed: | 1998 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,048 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 55.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8048 | 55.5 |
March 2015 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 8048 | 55.5 |
March 2013 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 8048 | 64.1 |
February 2011 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 10408 | 63.4 |
March 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 4085 | 66.4 |
March 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 7283 | 80.1 |
March 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 8600 | 80.0 |
June 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 8725 | 80.0 |
March 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 11625 | 79.6 |
August 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 8843 | 79.9 |
July 1997 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Good | 18955 | 59.0 |
July 1995 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Good | 13065 | 58.3 |
July 1993 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Good | 14450 | 58.2 |
December 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 18595 | 62.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 3,784 | 3,784 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 43,138 | 43,138 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 32,844 | 30,879 | 171 | 1,794 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 142 | 142 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 944 | 472 | 472 | 0 | 0 |